PoS vs Plasma Bridge
Last updated
Last updated
Moving between two large-scale blockchain networks requires a secure and robust cross-chain bridge, and Ramestta has achieved this by utilizing both Plasma and PoS(coming soon) security to create a trustless and bi-directional transaction environment between Ramestta and Polygon enables users to transfer tokens between the two networks without any third-party risks or impact on market liquidity. The network bridge is designed to be fast, cost-effective, and flexible, and also serves as a scaling solution. It utilizes a dual consensus architecture (Plasma + PoS platform) to prioritize speed and decentralization, and has deliberately enabled arbitrary state transitions on its sidechains along with EVM support.When your token crosses the bridge, it does not change its circulating supply:
Ramestta mints the same number of tokens (1:1) as a pegged token when a token leaves the Polygon network.
In order to move tokens back to the Polygon network, they are burned on the Ramestta network and unlocked on the Polygon network during the process.
PoS Bridge (Recommended)
Plasma Bridge
Short description
DApp Developers looking for flexibility and faster withdrawals with PoS system security
DApp Developers looking for increased security guarantees with Plasma exit mechanism
Structure
Highly flexible
Rigid, Less Flexible
Deposit (Polygon →Ramestta)
22-30 mins
22-30 mins
Withdrawal (Ramestta→Polygon)
1 checkpoint = ~ 30 mins to 6 hours
Call to the process-exit procedure on Polygon's contract.
Security
Proof-of-Stake system, secured by a robust set of external validators
Ramestta’s Plasma contracts piggybacks on Polygon’s security
Support Standards
MATIC, RAMA20, RAMA721, RAMA1155 and others
Only MATIC, RAMA20, RAMA721